Google forced to open up Android to rival search engines in Russia
Google forced to open up Android to rival search engines in Russia
Google has been forced to open up Android to rival search engines and applications in Russia, after settling a two-year battle with competition authorities for 439m roubles (£6.2m).
The deal sets a new precedent for Google, which until now has
resisted permitting the pre-installation of rival search engines and
certain applications on to the world’s most popular operating system. In
2015, Russia’s Federal Antimonopoly Service (FAS) ruled that the
Android-maker was breaking the law and abusing its dominant position
through restrictions on third-party manufacturers, fining Google 438m rubles (£6.2m) in August 2016.
The FAS said
that Google will no longer demand exclusivity of its applications on
Android devices sold in Russia and will not restrict the
pre-installation of rival search engines and other applications. Google
will also develop a tool allowing users to choose the default search
engine on new and existing Android devices, a similar measure put in
place by Microsoft for browser choice on Windows following antitrust
action by the European Commission.
“Users will be able to change settings at any time and choose the default search engine which suits their needs,” the FAS said.
The original complaint against the Android-maker was brought by local
rival Yandex, often referred to as Russia’s Google. The two firms have
also reached a commercial agreement with that “provides new
opportunities for Yandex to promote its search service within [Google’s
browser] Chrome”.
“We are pleased to announce that we have now reached a commercial
agreement with Yandex and a settlement with FAS that meets the interests
of all parties,” Google said in a statement.
Yandex chief executive Arkady Volozh called the settlement “an
important day for Russian consumers” as “millions of Russian Android
users will be offered a choice of search engines”.
Alexander Shulgin, head of Yandex Russian operations, said he hoped the agreement will have implications
for similar cases in Europe and elsewhere.
The deal is for a term of six years and nine months and was approved
by a Russian arbitration court on Monday. Under the terms of the
agreement, Google will still have to pay a total of 439m roubles (£6.2)
in fines.
Igor Artemiev, head of the FAS, said: “We managed to find a balance
between the necessity to develop the Android ecosystem and interests of
third-party developers for promoting their mobile applications and
services on Android-based devices. The settlement’s execution will have a
positive effect on the market as a whole, while giving developers
additional options for promoting their products.”
Google has faced scrutiny around the world for its practices
regarding the licensing of Android. The mobile operating system, which
is used on billions of devices and recently outpaced Microsoft’s Windows
as the most used operating system on the internet, is broadly formed of
two parts.
The first is a open-source core operation system called the Android
Open Source Project, which anyone can use without a license. The second
are Google’s services, which include the Google Play Store – the largest
source of third-party applications available to the platform.
Google has long licensed the Play Store and its services with
restrictions on the pre-installation and placement of certain elements
on the homescreen, including the Google search bar and a selection of
the company’s applications such as Gmail and Google Docs.
Users are free to modify the homescreen on first use but complainants
including Yandex have argued that Google’s licensing restrictions have
given its search engine and services an advantage over third parties
through the power of being the default.
The European Commission filed charges against Google
for abusing its dominant position with Android in April 2016, which
could carry fines up to £5.9bn, or 10% of its global revenue. Google denied the charges, but the Russian FAS settlement is likely to have a knock-on effect on Google’s battle with the EC.
No comments: